Today was Day 1 of the Keeneland Workshop. Many great talks were given, across a broad range of GPU computing topics. With last week’s ArrayFire Webinar fresh in mind, it was interesting to see similar conclusions drawn in a presentation by Kyle Spafford of Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Kyle independently ran a number of benchmarks over a period of time which show how quickly OpenCL has matured and where it yet has room for improvement. The slide below comes from Kyle’s presentation. For numbers >1, CUDA is faster. For numbers <1, OpenCL is faster. Performance in most cases is close to equivalent. Just as we showed in the ArrayFire webinar, OpenCL performance is quite comparable with CUDA performance. The Achilles heel …